News

Introduction: The Figure's Unmistakable Return

Walk into any major contemporary art gallery or fair today, from New York to London to Shanghai, and you will be met with a powerful, undeniable presence: the human figure. Vibrant, story-rich canvases depicting faces and bodies dominate the cultural landscape, marking the most significant aesthetic shift of the early 21st century. After a long period where abstraction and conceptualism reigned supreme, artists are returning to the oldest subject in art history with renewed urgency and invention. This is no simple revival of traditional portraiture; the styles emerging today are anything but conventional, merging pop culture references, digital aesthetics, and a profound engagement with the sticky, visceral matter of paint itself.

This phenomenon, which commands attention in both critical discourse and the auction room, poses a central question: Why, in our hyper-digital, fragmented world, has the art world returned so forcefully to the human form? The answer is not a mere swing of the stylistic pendulum. It represents a fundamental shift in art's perceived function from a medium of internal critique, as championed by modernism, to a powerful tool for social, political, and personal exploration. This article delves into the forces behind this resurgence, examining the 20th-century ideologies that banished the figure, the powerful narratives driving its return, the influence of our screen-based culture, and the leading artists who are defining this new chapter in art history.

Part I: The Reign of the Abstract: Greenberg, Modernism, and the Vanishing Figure

To understand the power of the figure’s return, one must first grasp the depth of its exile. The 20th century witnessed a profound ideological and aesthetic turn against representational art. Early modernist movements like Cubism, Fauvism, and Suprematism began the process, breaking from realistic depiction to explore innovative ways of capturing human experience. However, it was in the post-World War II era that figuration was most decisively marginalized, particularly in New York, the new epicenter of the art world.

Clement Greenberg's Formalism

The chief architect of this shift was the American art critic Clement Greenberg, whose influence in the mid-20th century was, according to art historian Bob Rosenblum, "papal". In a series of seminal essays, Greenberg articulated a theory of modernism known as Formalism. At its core was the concept of "medium specificity". He argued that the "rationale" of any modernist art form was to criticize itself, using its own methods to identify its unique and essential qualities. For painting, Greenberg declared, that essential quality was its inherent flatness. The limitations of the medium, the flat surface, the shape of the support, and the properties of pigment were not negative factors to be overcome, but the very subject of the art.

Consequently, any attempt to create the illusion of three-dimensional space or to tell a story was a betrayal of painting's true nature. He argued that even "the fragmentary silhouette of a human figure" was a concession to the domain of sculpture and literature, compromising painting's hard-won autonomy. Narrative and political content were dismissed as irrelevant "surplusage" or, in his famous 1939 essay, as "kitsch," a debased, formulaic culture designed for easy consumption. Greenberg championed the Abstract Expressionists, particularly Jackson Pollock, as the apotheosis of this ideal, artists who engaged directly with the flatness of the canvas in a way that was self-referential and unapologetically abstract.

Conceptual Art's Dematerialization

Following on the heels of Abstract Expressionism, the Conceptual art movement of the 1960s and 1970s further displaced painting and the art object itself. Its central tenet, radical at the time, was that the idea or concept behind the work was more important than the finished physical product. Artists like Joseph Kosuth and Lawrence Weiner sought to bypass the increasingly commercialized art world by creating works that were not easily bought or sold. The resulting art forms, from written descriptions to performance pieces, intentionally dematerialized the artwork, shifting the focus from the aesthetic object to the intellectual process. In this climate, the craft-intensive, object-based practice of figurative painting seemed doubly obsolete.

What was initially presented as a pure, aesthetic evolution was, in reality, a profoundly political act that created the conditions for its own eventual repudiation. Greenberg's theory, developed in the context of the Cold War, was not merely descriptive but prescriptive. It championed a specific type of American art as the universal pinnacle of a linear historical progression, effectively sidelining other artistic traditions. By defining "quality" in a way that excluded narrative, social commentary, and recognizable figures, his formalism created an aesthetic dogma that rendered the lived experiences of many, particularly women, artists of color, and those outside the New York-centric art world, invisible and irrelevant. This "depoliticization" of art was later identified by critics as a political move in itself, one that aligned American avant-garde art with the rhetoric of Western individualism. The supposedly neutral pursuit of "purity" was revealed to be an exclusionary void. It is precisely this void that subsequent generations of artists have felt a powerful, political, and deeply human need to fill with bodies, stories, and identities.

Part II: A Counter-Narrative: The Enduring Tradition of the Figure Beyond the West

The narrative of figurative painting’s 20th-century "death" and 21st-century "rebirth" is a compelling one, but it is also profoundly Western-centric. While the figure may have vanished from the avant-garde discourse of New York and Paris, it remained a vibrant and central subject in many other parts of the world. The rich, continuous tradition of figuration in Persian art offers a powerful counter-narrative, revealing that the modernist break with the figure was a culturally specific phenomenon, not a universal law of art history.

The World of the Persian Miniature

Persian art under Islam never completely forbade the human figure. In the intimate and private tradition of the miniature, small, intricate paintings designed for books or albums, the depiction of human figures was central. These works were characterized by a deep and critical kinship between text and image, often illustrating epic narratives like Ferdowsi's 10th-century Shahnameh (Book of Kings) or Nizami Ganjavi's Khosrow and Shirin.

This tradition developed a unique visual language for storytelling, distinct from the conventions of European painting. While Renaissance artists in the West were developing single-point perspective to create an illusion of realistic depth, Persian miniaturists employed a different spatial logic. Their compositions are complex and multi-layered, often showing several narrative moments within a single frame. They utilized what art historians have termed "vertical perspective," where figures further away are placed higher on the page but remain the same size as those in the foreground. A figure's scale was determined not by its position in space, but by its social, political, or divine importance. The world depicted was not a mirror of objective reality but an "ethereal, hallucinatory and haunting" celestial realm, a space between the material and the spiritual.

Adaptation and Synthesis in the Qajar Dynasty

This tradition of figuration continued to evolve. The 19th-century Qajar dynasty, for instance, saw a flourishing of life-size royal portraiture that blended deep-rooted Persian traditions with new influences from Europe. Artists of this period adopted the medium of oil on canvas and incorporated elements of European realism, particularly in the rendering of objects and fabrics. However, they combined this with a distinctly Persian approach to the human form, which remained idealized and symbolic. The famous portraits of Fath-Ali Shah Qajar, with his exaggeratedly long beard and narrow waist, exemplify this synthesis a non-Western tradition actively engaging with and adapting, rather than simply succumbing to, Western artistic conventions.

Re-contextualizing the Western modernist "break" with figuration through this global lens reveals it not as a universal evolution of art, but as a specific departure from its own Renaissance-derived conventions of illusionistic realism. The contemporary global return to the figure is, therefore, more than just a revival; it is a convergence. Artists today, working in a globalized art world, draw from a vast and diverse pool of influences. An artist might reference a European Old Master in one canvas and a Persian miniature in the next. The current moment is not a simple return to a Western figurative tradition but a synthesis of multiple, continuous traditions from around the world. It suggests that the modernist prohibition on the figure was a historical anomaly, and the current era represents a return to a more global, historical norm where storytelling and the human form are, and always have been, central to the project of art.

Part III: The Why of Now: Drivers of the 21st-Century Figurative Resurgence

The powerful return of the figure to the center of contemporary art is not driven by a single impulse but by a confluence of cultural, political, and technological forces. Artists are turning to the human form to satisfy a renewed hunger for storytelling, to wage political battles over representation, and to make sense of the body in our increasingly disembodied digital age.

A Hunger for Stories (Narrative Figuration)

After decades dominated by the cool detachment of formalism and conceptualism, there is a palpable desire for art that connects with viewers on a human level. Modern Narrative Figurative Art uses expressive depictions of the human form to tell stories, blending realism with emotional depth to explore personal and societal themes. This taps into a timeless human impulse. As a historical precedent, the French "Narrative Figuration" movement of the 1960s reacted against abstraction by using imagery from popular culture, comics, and cinema to critique consumer society and political events. Today's artists are similarly using the figure to create compelling narratives that invite viewers to connect and interpret. In an image-saturated culture, where we are bombarded by fleeting digital pictures, the "slow, full-resolution" image of a figurative painting offers a powerful antidote, a space for sustained contemplation and connection.

The Politics of Presence (Identity & Representation)

Perhaps the most potent force driving the figurative resurgence is the politics of identity. Since the early 2000s, figurative art has become the primary arena for exploring identity politics, offering a powerful tool for artists from historically marginalized groups to assert their presence and rewrite exclusionary narratives. Artists who are women, people of color, and members of the LGBTQ+ community are using the figure to challenge old stereotypes, reclaim their own stories, and insert themselves into an art history from which they have been largely absent. This includes a conscious subversion of the historical "male gaze," a term from feminist theory describing the tradition of depicting women as passive, sexualized objects for the pleasure of a male viewer. By painting figures that are complex, self-possessed, and often confrontational, these artists are transforming the canvas from a site of objectification into a space of empowerment and subjective agency.

The Body in the Digital Age

Our lives, mediated through screens, have fostered a paradoxical relationship with the human body. It is at once hyper-visible, endlessly documented in selfies and social media profiles, and strangely dematerialized, reduced to pixels on a screen. Contemporary figurative painting responds directly to this paradox. It re-establishes the physical, visceral, and psychological reality of the human form. The slow, tactile process of applying paint to canvas to render flesh becomes a potent and grounding act in a fast-paced, virtual world. The painted figure serves as a powerful counterpoint to the endless, curated scroll of digital self-representation, reminding us of the complex, imperfect, and tangible nature of our own embodiment.

While the focus on identity has been a vital and corrective force, it has also created a complex and sometimes contradictory field. The laudable institutional goal of amplifying marginalized voices can inadvertently create new pressures and categorizations. Some artists express frustration at being expected to constantly perform their identity, feeling pigeonholed into representing their "minority experience" above all else. This creates a tension between the art world's demand for "authentic" identity-based work and an artist's desire for creative freedom beyond that specific label. The most sophisticated figurative art today navigates this very tension, creating work that is deeply "steeped in" the complexities of identity without being reducible to a simple label, thereby refusing easy identification.

Part IV: Vanguards of the New Figuration: Case Studies

The theoretical drivers of the figurative resurgence find their most powerful expression in the studios of contemporary artists. A few key figures, through their distinct approaches to the human form, have become vanguards of this new movement, demonstrating its remarkable range and depth.

Jenny Saville: The Visceral Body

British painter Jenny Saville has been credited with reinventing the female nude for the contemporary era. Working on a monumental scale, she applies oil paint in thick, heavy layers, creating canvases where the pigment itself becomes as visceral as flesh. Her subjects are raw and unflinching depictions of the female form, focusing on mass, volume, and the realities of flesh; its bruises, distortions, and textures rather than conforming to traditional or media-driven ideals of beauty. Her work directly challenges the long art-historical tradition of the objectified female nude and the filtered perfection of the social media age, exploring instead the ambiguous and powerful space between figuration and abstraction. Saville's paintings are not just representations of bodies; they are profound inquiries into the experience of embodiment itself. Explore Jenny Saville's powerful works at Gagosian.

Kehinde Wiley: The Canon Remixed

Kehinde Wiley's practice is a direct and brilliant political intervention into the Western art-historical canon. He is renowned for his hyper-realistic, large-scale portraits of contemporary Black and Brown men and women, whom he often finds through "street casting" in urban centers around the globe. He then places these figures into the heroic, powerful, and majestic poses of European Old Master portraiture, borrowing from artists like Titian, van Dyck, and Jacques-Louis David. This act of juxtaposition is a powerful critique of the historical exclusion of Black figures from these dominant narratives of power, wealth, and prestige. Wiley's work is a "celebration of decadence and empire," but it is re-appropriated to empower subjects who have historically been denied that visual inheritance, forcing a conversation about who gets to be seen as heroic. Discover Kehinde Wiley's groundbreaking portraits on his official website and view his selected works.

Michaël Borremans: The Uncanny Gaze

Belgian artist Michaël Borremans represents a more psychological and enigmatic strand of contemporary figuration. He combines a virtuosic, Old Master-like technical mastery with subject matter that is deliberately ambiguous, unsettling, and resistant to any straightforward interpretation. His figures often appear in bizarre costumes or situations, their faces averted or obscured, existing in a timeless, void-like space that feels both theatrical and menacing. Borremans's paintings are seductive enigmas, drawing the viewer in with their beauty while simultaneously creating a deep sense of unease. His work explores themes of power, absurdity, and the darker corners of the human condition, leaving the viewer with more questions than answers. Delve into the mysterious world of Michaël Borremans at Michael Borremans.

New Voices, New Visions

A host of other influential artists demonstrates the breadth of the figurative movement:

• Lynette Yiadom-Boakye: A British artist and writer, Yiadom-Boakye paints entirely fictional portraits of Black figures. Untethered to a specific time or place, her subjects exist in a timeless, ambiguous realm, allowing her to explore the universal human condition while focusing on characters who have been underrepresented in art history.
• Jordan Casteel: An American painter whose large-scale, empathetic portraits capture the members of her community, particularly in Harlem. Using a palette of vibrant, luminescent color and rendering her subjects with intimate detail, Casteel conveys a profound sense of presence, dignity, and authentic human connection.

Part V: The Sanbuk Connection: Contemporary Figuration and Persian Heritage

Bridging the global resurgence of the figure with the deep-rooted artistic traditions of Iran, a new generation of artists is creating work that is both intensely contemporary and culturally specific. Sanbuk.Art, an innovative online gallery dedicated to contemporary art that "pushes boundaries, challenges norms, and reflects the ever-evolving creative landscape," provides a vital platform for these voices. The artists it represents are active participants in the global figurative movement, bringing a unique perspective informed by the continuous tradition of Persian figuration.

• Sirvan Kanaani: A Persian Kurd painter, Kanaani's work is a dynamic fusion of romanticism, expressionism, and Cubist-inspired forms. His recent collections, such as "Afoul" and "Pondering in Silence," are the culmination of a decade-long study of the "contemporary human," exploring profound psychological states and themes of love, solitude, and the internal tensions of the modern mind. His art exemplifies the power of the figure to map our innermost landscapes. See the expressive works of Sirvan Kanaani.
• Marjan Andaroudi: As an Iranian-American artist, Andaroudi's abstract-figurative practice is deeply influenced by the existential themes of the celebrated Persian poet Omar Khayyam. Her work delves into universal questions of human existence: captivity, suffering, oppression, and resilience, using the fluidity of abstraction to bridge her personal reflections with the viewer's own emotional experience. Her practice demonstrates how the figure can serve as a potent starting point for profound existential inquiry. Explore the existential art of Marjan Andaroudi.
• Armin Ebrahimpour: Ebrahimpour's expressionist paintings act as a "mirror against the endless behaviors of man". His work confronts fundamental questions of human existence: "Why and what a person is and where he comes from," using evocative form, color, and personal motifs to explore these enduring mysteries. View the compelling expressionism of Armin Ebrahimpour.
• Arezoo Jabbari & Saeedeh Aeeni: These artists further illustrate the diversity of contemporary Iranian figuration. Jabbari's modernist portraits investigate the complex relationship between inner personality and outer appearance, often through the symbolic treatment of skin. Aeeni, with her strong academic background and research into themes like the role of the animal in contemporary Iranian painting, brings a practice deeply engaged with art history, memory, and identity. Discover the portraits of Arezoo Jabbari and the thoughtful works of Saeedeh Aeeni.

The work of these contemporary Iranian artists reveals a unique "double consciousness." They are, on one hand, heirs to a continuous, non-Western figurative tradition where the figure never suffered the exile it did in the West. On the other hand, they are active participants in a globalized contemporary art world profoundly shaped by Western postmodern discourses on identity, narrative, and memory. Their art is not simply a "return" to the figure, because in their cultural lineage, the figure never truly left. Instead, their work represents a sophisticated synthesis: applying contemporary modes of psychological and political inquiry to a visual language that has its own deep, non-Western roots. This gives their work a unique layering, allowing it to speak to both a global audience and a specific cultural history at the same time.

Part VI: The Virtual Gallery: Social Media and the Figurative Boom

The resurgence of figurative painting has been amplified and accelerated by a powerful contemporary force: social media. The symbiotic relationship between platforms like Instagram and the new wave of figuration has not only expanded the movement's reach but has also fundamentally altered the dynamics of how art is created, shared, and consumed.

Democratization and Disintermediation

In the past, the art world was governed by a select group of gatekeepers: galleries, critics, and curators. Social media has radically disrupted this model. Platforms like Instagram function as virtual galleries, providing artists with unprecedented visibility and a direct line to a global audience, thereby reducing their dependence on the traditional gallery system. This digital democratization allows artists to build their own communities, engage in direct dialogue with patrons, and even sell their work without an intermediary, fostering a modern-day patronage system.

An Aesthetic Feedback Loop

The very nature of Instagram, a visual-first platform centered on images of people, is inherently suited to portraiture and figuration. The cultural obsession with the "self," documented through a constant stream of selfies and personal photos, has created a highly receptive environment for art that explores the same themes of identity, personality, and the human form. This has created an aesthetic feedback loop, where the popularity of figurative art on the platform encourages more artists to work in that mode. At the same time, the metrics of social media "likes," "shares," and "followers" have introduced a new, populist form of art criticism, blurring the traditional lines between "serious" and "popular" art and giving rise to a new class of digital art influencers. However, this new landscape is not without its challenges. The sheer volume of content leads to oversaturation and intense competition, while artists must also contend with the pressures of ever-changing algorithms, visibility biases, and the risk that commercial pressures may stifle true artistic innovation.

This digital revolution has done more than just amplify the figurative trend; it has fundamentally altered the nature of portraiture itself. Historically, portraiture was often a top-down, transactional practice: a wealthy patron commissioned an artist to create a status symbol. Social media helps invert this dynamic. Many contemporary artists, like Jordan Casteel, build relationships within their communities first, with the portrait emerging from that authentic connection. On platforms like Instagram, artists share their process, discuss their ideas, and foster a loyal following that supports them both financially and morally. In this new ecosystem, the "portrait" is no longer just the final painting; it is the entire network of interaction, dialogue, and community that surrounds its creation. Portraiture has evolved from a purely transactional object into a relational, community-based act.

Conclusion: The Future of the Figure

The powerful return of figurative painting is not a fleeting trend or a nostalgic regression. It is a sophisticated, multifaceted, and necessary response to the conditions of 21st-century life. Having moved beyond the formalist dogmas of the last century, artists have reclaimed the human form as the most potent vehicle for exploring our most urgent contemporary themes: identity, community, psychology, and our place in a complex, interconnected world. As long as we remain compelled by our own reflections in the mirror, figurative art will remain vital.

The movement is not without its challenges. The intense market demand carries the risk of saturation, and the focus on identity politics requires artists to navigate the fine line between authentic representation and the pressure to perform a specific narrative. Yet, the most compelling artists working today are pushing the genre forward, experimenting with form, subverting historical tropes, and addressing social issues with ever-increasing nuance.

The future of figurative painting lies in its remarkable capacity for evolution, its ability to absorb new technologies, to reflect an ever-more diverse and globalized world, and to tell the timeless stories of human experience in a way that feels both immediate and profound. The figure has not just returned; it has been re-centered as the enduring face of our time, and it is here to stay.